I have been teaching college mathematics for many years, and quit recently. (Well, I called it retirement, but actually it was quitting.) But I was getting a little bored, and decided to put up a video on YouTube to show an alternative method for doing something students learn in Calculus 2.
Well, I just finished it, and it involved quite a bit of algebra. And I was wondering just how much detailed explanation would need to accompany the slides, to make the calculations comprehensible to a typical viewer. For instance, I had to compare the results we would have gotten, with an authoritative result from WolframAlpha, a program we used at our school, until it became a little too demanding for our majors, and some of our faculty! (Our school is still ahead of the curve, but depending on how much incoming faculty at schools like ours like to trade interesting content for easier, more entertaining content, we might end up behind the curve. Read on.) The two answers are the same, except for a little algebra. Here is a screen capture of the last slide:
Anticipating the question: "What has 192 got to do with anything?", I added the little note at the bottom.
Now, I expect my readers to be divided pretty much in half between (a) those who think "It is perfectly clear that the answers were the same," and (b) those who think, "Well, that may be the case, but an explanation is in order, after all, these are just kids; heck I could not have figured that out, and I'm pretty good at math!"
Part of the problem is that many sorts of employers, both businesses and the government (or as we say in economics circles: the Private Sector and the Public Sector) want their prospective hires to know calculus. Among other things, this means that Calculus teachers have to deal with students now who suspect that they will never actually use Calculus in their chosen fields, and their suspicions are probably right. Over the last several years, things have let up a little, but there was a time when even Pre-Med students needed to get a good grade in Calculus to get into Medical School. Why is this? I don't know, but I can guess. And my guess would give you pause as to the motives of the Medical Education Industry.
Coming back to those algebraic formulas above, it boils down to whether or not two formulas which look roughly like
are equal. This material is actually learned (in most schools, at least a decade ago) in Grade 8, in better school districts. Obviously, there's nothing to be done if you happened to live in a school district in which most parents prefer that their kids get better grades than a rigorous mathematics training. This is one of the major pairs of opposing forces that keep battling inside most parent's heads. The kid is hamstrung unless its grades are good, but the kid will struggle to even understand its math classes unless it knows its algebra really well. Looking up these algebra facts just can't be done in real time; they have to be at the tips of the child's fingers.
In addition to school training, there is the problem of discipline. Fractions are an obnoxious kind of mathematical thing; most kids prefer to use decimals. Fractions are exact, while decimals are usually approximations, and for most purposes, including Chemistry, Biology, Physics, Economics, Political Science, Business, Engineering and Statistics, approximations are good enough. (They have to be good approximations.) So why do math teachers keep plugging these fractions?
The fractions are more logically useful. Before the decimal approximation can be applied, the formula is developed using fractions; the relationships between various quantities are given using fractions. Once the number you're interested in is narrowed down in terms of fractions, it can be approximated using decimals. If anyone takes a nap while the fractions are being thrown around, and wakes up just when the calculator is needed, he or she will know a number, which may not be any use for the next problem, and will not know how it is arrived at.
This little post about fractions and elementary algebra describes only the tip of the iceberg. Better minds than mine must address the problem that Indian and Chinese and Russian and Brazilian kids learn algebra a lot faster than American kids. Their lives are tough enough that algebra is hardly something to complain about. In contrast, for American kids, algebra is the worst kind of torture they have to face, so that for many men and women, algebra is the poster-boy for the unpleasant subjects they had to deal with in grade school, and which thankfully they did not need to suffer with in Adult Life. If we keep up this level of intolerance to mathematics, kids might end up refusing to subtract, even if they reluctantly agree to occasionally add. Think that's funny? If Medical Schools keep up the mathematics requirements for admission, their numbers will fall, and we will find most of our medical professionals coming from overseas. Which is not entirely a bad thing, I have to add. On the other hand, if med schools relax the math requirements for admission, many citizens will harbor the (entirely unfounded) suspicion that medical professionals of the years after 2018 are not quite up to the standards we're accustomed to.
What the Monkey should have said is that There is no progress without some drudgery.
Arch
Can the US follow Sri Lanka’s new example?
-
I have written in the past about Sri Lanka’s deteriorating democracy, with
corrupt, nepotistic family dynasties that enriched themselves while
pursuing cha...
18 hours ago
1 comment:
About why pre-meds are required to take calculus: pre-meds are f expected to take two semesters of physics, and over the years physics departments have phased out their non-calculus physics courses. Not sure that is completely justified. It isn't fun to have to teach physics to people who haven't taken calculus, but life's a beach.
Post a Comment